Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Small

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 16.4.
  • Mistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index42.533.4
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Coding13901362
SciCode—26.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct—36.1%
LiveBench Coding—36.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—46.6%
ALE-Bench—497.62

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.1%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Hard Prompts13991335
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.8%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—44.8%
DTBench—70.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—53.7%
LMCA—20.6%
LiveBench—44%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Math14141341
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—5.8%
LiveBench Math—39.9%
MATH Level 5—46.8%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Expert13951291
GPQA Diamond—47.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
MMLU—68.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Vision—1142

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Non-English13951315
LMArena Chinese14251340
LMArena Korean14061259
LMArena Russian13851324
LMArena French—1337
LMArena German—1340
LMArena Japanese—1275
LMArena Spanish—1346

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following13741310
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.7%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Longer Query13841327

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small
LMArena Text14011338
LMArena Creative Writing13921305
LMArena Multi-Turn13931344
LiveBench Language—30.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Small?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Mistral Small better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper