Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Phi-4

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 40.5.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi-4 specifications
Hunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.531.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Coding13901231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts13991220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Math14141246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Expert13951203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Non-English13951197
LMArena Chinese14251212
LMArena Korean14061151
LMArena Russian13851209
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Instruction Following13741201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Longer Query13841217

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4
LMArena Text14011217
LMArena Creative Writing13921182
LMArena Multi-Turn13931206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Phi-4?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Phi-4 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi-4 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper