Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Small 3.2
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 45.1.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.73 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.