Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Small 3.2

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

30.8

Rank #271 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 45.1.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
Hunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index41.830.8
Released—2025-06-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens—$0.25
Results tracked136

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
LMArena Coding1389—

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark—40.4%
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1399—
Epoch Capabilities Index—131.73

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30.3%
LMArena Math1414—

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
LMArena Expert1395—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1395—
LMArena Chinese1424—
LMArena Korean1403—
LMArena Russian1384—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1375—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
LMArena Longer Query1384—

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3.2
LMArena Text1401—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1255
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper