Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Small 3

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

30.9

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 32.4.
  • Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Hunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index41.830.9
Released—2025-01-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1324

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Coding13891246
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13991233
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.06

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Math14141240
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Expert13951202
GPQA Diamond—47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English13951198
LMArena Chinese14241204
LMArena Korean14031188
LMArena Russian13841216
LMArena French—1202
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following13751214

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query13841246

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Small 3
LMArena Text14011234
LMArena Creative Writing13911195
LMArena Multi-Turn13931217
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Small 3?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Small 3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper