Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.8 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1390 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1374 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.