Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs o1

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 4 categories and o1 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 42.2.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711o1
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index42.540.9
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1352

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), o1: 46.1 (#70)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Coding13901367
Aider Polyglot—61.7%
WeirdML—47.6%
LiveBench Coding—69.7%
CadEval—56%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—80.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning Too close to call

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), o1: 27.9 (#111)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Hard Prompts13991371
SimpleBench—41.7%
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
Chess Puzzles—15%
EnigmaEval—5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—91.6%
DTBench—74.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA—22.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.91
LiveBench—75.7%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), o1: 36.1 (#175)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Math14141388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math—80.3%
MATH Level 5—94.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%

Knowledge o1 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), o1: 41.5 (#110)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Expert13951361
GPQA Diamond—76.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
Confabulations—11.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Vision—1168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), o1: 48.6 (#142)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Non-English13951358
LMArena Chinese14251394
LMArena Korean14061396
LMArena Russian13851356
LMArena French—1344
LMArena German—1337
LMArena Japanese—1346
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following o1 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), o1: 74.8 (#86)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Instruction Following13741367
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.5%

Long Context o1 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), o1: 50.3 (#9)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Longer Query13841378
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), o1: 55.6 (#144)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711o1
LMArena Text14011366
LMArena Creative Writing13921348
LMArena Multi-Turn13931369
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LiveBench Language—65.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than o1?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and o1 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper