Model comparison
Grok-3 mini vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Grok-3 mini and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.0 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 27.3 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1389 |
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | — |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1386 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | 1336 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 1352 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | 1357 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1379 | — |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1356 | 1375 |
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-3 mini better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Grok-3 mini and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.0 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Grok-3 mini or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 40.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.