Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.4

Rank #141 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 27.3 to 22.3.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index40.441.8
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14001389
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14071399
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.45—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math14271414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert13971395
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14101395
LMArena Chinese14611424
LMArena Korean13931403
LMArena Russian14201384
LMArena French1423—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1411—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following13761375

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query13941384

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14161401
LMArena Creative Writing14011391
LMArena Multi-Turn14171393

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 40.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper