Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mixtral 8x22B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.8 to 15.1.
- Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1166 |
| WeirdML | — | 3.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 64.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1150 |
| DTBench | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.03 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1184 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 24.2% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1113 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 46% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 33.4% |
| MMLU | — | 77.8% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1116 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1057 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1158 |
| LMArena French | — | 1166 |
| LMArena German | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1037 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1151 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1147 |
| IFEval | — | 72.4% |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1144 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1141 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1130 |
| WildBench | — | 71.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mixtral 8x22B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mixtral 8x22B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.