Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 29.6.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1107 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1065 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1080 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1006 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1058 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.