Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 31.1.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Hunyuan T1 20250711 specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderIBMTencent
Noometry Index31.642.5
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding11121390
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts10921399

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math11431414

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert10871395

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English10371395
LMArena Chinese10631425
LMArena Russian10601385
LMArena Korean—1406

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following10881374

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query11221384

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text10961401
LMArena Creative Writing10711392
LMArena Multi-Turn10631393

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper