Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 21.9.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1390 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1399 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1414 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1395 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1374 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.