Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1445 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1465 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.