Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs QwQ-32B
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and QwQ-32B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 39.5.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1297 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than QwQ-32B?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and QwQ-32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.