Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 34.2.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Grok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index39.937.9
Released2025-04-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14321270
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14341264
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math13911274
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14211248
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14101262
LMArena Chinese14481319
LMArena Russian14161258
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1387—
LMArena Korean1373—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14091245
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14391301
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14261274
LMArena Creative Writing14141242
LMArena Multi-Turn14251275
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper