Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 51.3 to 34.2.
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 37.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.49 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.93 |
Math Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.1 vs 37.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.