Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mercury
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mercury score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 5 categories and Mercury in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 25.0 to 17.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 37.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1322 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1285 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 21.6% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1239 |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1191 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1282 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mercury?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mercury score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Mercury better for coding?
Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mercury share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.