Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 51.3 to 35.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 73.9% for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.49 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 52.5% | 73.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.93 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.9 vs 37.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.