Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 7 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1314 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1299 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1289 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.