Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.2 to 33.6.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.