Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 46.0 to 41.9.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.838.8
Released2025-02-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding13221314
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts13241299
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math13091298
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert13051289
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English13231265
LMArena Chinese13391314
LMArena German13061231
LMArena Japanese13011207
LMArena Russian13281271
LMArena French1347—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following13051275
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query13201292

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text13301299
LMArena Creative Writing13191262
LMArena Multi-Turn13071299
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.9 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper