Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 47.4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 44.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1516 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1481 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1477 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1516 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1424 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1465 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.