Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Magistral Small
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 25.0 to 6.8.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Magistral Small?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Magistral Small better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.