Model comparison
Magistral Small vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 24.1 to 6.9.
Side by side
| Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Small better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Small or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 37.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.