Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.