Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiniMax-M2.1
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.0 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.5 to 48.9.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1410 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1396 |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1432 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1430 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1386 |
| LMArena French | — | 1405 |
| LMArena German | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1399 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1396 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiniMax-M2.1?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.0 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.1 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.