Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.5 to 42.0.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1307 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1286 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1277 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1341 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1284 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.