Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.1 to 13.5.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1130 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1155 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1177 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1073 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1116 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.