Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen Max
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen Max in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 35.5 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 34.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1269 |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1268 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Qwen Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | 1262 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen Max?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen Max better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.