Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Qwen Max
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Max in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 35.5 to 22.3.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1269 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1271 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Qwen Max leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | 1262 |
Long Context Qwen Max leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1238 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Qwen Max?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or Qwen Max better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Qwen Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.