Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 37.6 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1307 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1257 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1269 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1250 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1180 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1250 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1279 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1253 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.