Model comparison
Command A vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 37.9 to 26.8.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1314 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Too close to call
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1298 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1289 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1275 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.