Noometry

Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for Grok Build 0.1 and 36.1% for Trinity Large Thinking.
  • Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
  • Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderxAIArcee AI
Noometry Index36.438.6
Released2026-04-162026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output256K80K
Input $ / M tokens$1$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$2$0.80
Results tracked324

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
SciCode50.2%36.1%
LMArena WebDev—1238
LMArena Coding—1381

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
GBAEval2.4%—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
CritPt9.1%0.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1350
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math—1366

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%
LMArena Expert—1360

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English—1325
LMArena Chinese—1373
LMArena French—1374
LMArena German—1356
LMArena Japanese—1311
LMArena Korean—1306
LMArena Russian—1337
LMArena Spanish—1357

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following—1334

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query—1355

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text—1340
LMArena Creative Writing—1320
LMArena Multi-Turn—1342

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper