Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 37.5 to 22.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 9.1% for Grok Build 0.1 and 26.6% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 256K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 60.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.