Noometry

Model comparison

Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 27.2.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Command AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index36.550.3
Released2025-03-132026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K1.05M
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.87
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding13301534
Aider Polyglot12%—
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 35.9 (#40), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts13261512
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
CritPt—26.6%
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math13001494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert12951543
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command A: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English13131474
LMArena Chinese13271529
LMArena Russian13141480
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following13091493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query13341501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text13311492
LMArena Creative Writing13191468
LMArena Multi-Turn13391464
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper