Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.4 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 22.7 to 15.7.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1312 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10% |
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1316 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1360 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1284 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1308 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1299 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1317 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?
Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.4 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.