Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Grok Build 0.1 and Granite 4.0 H Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.4 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 24.4.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1249 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Granite 4.0 H Small: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1240 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1247 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1251 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 89% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1222 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1211 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1242 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Grok Build 0.1 and Granite 4.0 H Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.4 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.