Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok Build 0.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.4 vs 35.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

36.4

Rank #208 Confirmed

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

35.8

Rank #214 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 21.5.
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index36.435.8
Released2025-06-172026-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M256K
Max output66K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.40$2
Results tracked333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167), Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML35.2%—
LMArena Coding1373—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89), Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—
GBAEval—2.4%

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
CritPt—9.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1377—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.93—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
Omni-MATH48%—
LMArena Math1373—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—
LMArena Expert1373—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Non-English1369—
LMArena Chinese1404—
LMArena French1388—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1358—
LMArena Russian1373—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
IFEval81%—
LMArena Instruction Following1366—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—
LMArena Longer Query1373—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Text1379—
LMArena Creative Writing1366—
WildBench81.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1367—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Grok Build 0.1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.4 vs 35.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Grok Build 0.1?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper