Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Wizardlm 70b

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 33.3.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4 and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Grok 4Wizardlm 70b
ProviderxAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index48.133.0
Released2025-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14081081
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14091079
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14221116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—
LMArena Expert1415—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1210—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14031078
LMArena Chinese14271052
LMArena German14291083
LMArena Russian14101155
LMArena French1418—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1377—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13871093
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14091097
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14111120
LMArena Creative Writing13971149
LMArena Multi-Turn14161108
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper