Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 47.4.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1270 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1264 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1274 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1248 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1258 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1245 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.