Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 34.2.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.947.5
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked1237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding12701467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12641449
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.65

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math12741450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Expert12481454
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English12621424
LMArena Chinese13191477
LMArena Russian12581434
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12451425

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query13011439
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text12741437
LMArena Creative Writing12421404
LMArena Multi-Turn12751438

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper