Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.8

Rank #19 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.3 to 27.3.

Side by side

Grok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index56.841.8
Released2026-08-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked4913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14641389
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1620—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14451399
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.48—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math14161414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert14631395
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1265—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14221395
LMArena Chinese14791424
LMArena Korean13951403
LMArena Russian14271384
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1425—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Spanish1408—

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14311375

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14531384

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14271401
LMArena Creative Writing14301391
LMArena Multi-Turn14221393

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper