Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.7 to 38.7.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 58.3 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $25 | — |
| Results tracked | 66 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1518 | 1390 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1558 | — |
| SciCode | 54.5% | — |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.25 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |
Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1480 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1531 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1464 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1503 | — |
| LMArena German | 1495 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1495 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1374 |
Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.