Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 28.5.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1390 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1487 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1374 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1384 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.