Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Wizardlm 13b
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 30K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1035 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1048 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Wizardlm 13b?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.