Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 39.2 to 18.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.