Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Wizardlm 13b

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.6 to 30.5.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Inkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
ProviderThinking Machines LabMicrosoft
Noometry Index46.531.4
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14511035
LMArena WebDev1409—
SciCode48.7%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14231018
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index150.15—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14591017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—
LMArena Expert1442—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1235—

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14021034
LMArena Chinese14651023
LMArena French1436—
LMArena German1405—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1363—
LMArena Russian1391—
LMArena Spanish1428—

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13991048

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14011054

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14141077
LMArena Creative Writing13311091
LMArena Multi-Turn14181047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Wizardlm 13b?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper