Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 30K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | — |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.