Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 750× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 38.9 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 55.8% for GPT-5 Pro and 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 272K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | 144.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | 19.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 750× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.