Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 25.7.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 45.5 | 39.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2026-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 30K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.16 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.6 (#143)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1458 | 1370 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 25.7 (#128)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1335 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 34.7 (#156)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1355 |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 36.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1354 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1292 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1369 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1280 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | 1233 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1257 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1321 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.8 (#166)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1317 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#160)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1430 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#198)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1324 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1254 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1327 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1280 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 39.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.